She is a founding member of one of the most successful and enduring superhero teams of all time. The first family of comic books. The Fantastic Four. Some have written about why and and how this extraordinary team stays together and have been so popular. Especially as they are unique amongst the other super teams because they are a family in the truest sense of the word, except for Ben Grimm they are either related by marriage or blood.
The virtue and moral position of the Fantastic Four is rarely called into question. There is little doubt that they fall firmly on the side of good. But when we examine the female quarter of this team it can be asked why Susan Storm/Richards aka The Invisible Woman is good when there is so much opportunity to be bad.
When Susan Storm the then fiancé of Reed Richards (later known as Mr Fantastic) was exposed to cosmic rays she developed the power of invisibility, later she developed the ability to create and control force fields. It is her invisibility power of course that she is best known for simply based on her super hero name The Invisible Woman.
It is this power that presents the most corrupting opportunities. To be able to make oneself invisible is an amazing ability that in the best case offers the potential for equally amazing good. In the worst case it offers the chance to perform the most vile of intrusions.
In the 1897 HG Wells novel The Invisible Man the title character becomes insane with the prospect of never becoming visible again. After a series of events he realises that he may perform illegal acts with little or no consequence and swiftly descends into madness with thoughts of world dominance. He is killed by a mob as he attempts to see revenge on one of the characters.
Our Invisible Woman however is able to become invisible at will and able to return as easily. She has no burden of concern regarding if anyone will ever see her again. There is however still the same possibilities for mischief and the potential to view herself outside the rules of society.
Already Susan Richards is an outsider from normal society. Normal society for her is the very strange world of the Fantastic Four family unit. Her husband Mr Fantastic has the ability to stretch and mould his body as if it were rubber. Susan’s brother Johnny Storm aka The Human Torch can raise his own temperature to engulf himself in flame and control fire. Ben Grimm aka The Thing is an orange rock covered monster with super human strength.
Mr Fantastic and The Human Torch are both not as separated from normal society boundaries as much as The Invisible Woman despite their extraordinary powers. Both are recognisable as humans, even The Human Torch in ‘flame on’ mode is clearly still seen as a man. A man covered in flames but a man all the same. They are unable to separate themselves from their actions, they are still accountable and are therefore bound by society rules. If say The Human Torch were to toast a bad guy in front of anyone then he would be held accountable. There is a consequence that he would have to face. Of course punishment might prove a little harder to enforce however at the very least he would face expulsion from the ranks of the good.
If the Invisible Woman were to silently walk up to someone and kill them whilst invisible it would be infinitely harder to point the finger at the person you can’t prove was there… not impossible just harder. Of course Susan’s other ability to create force fields would, if used in the assignation, take care of anything physical evidence. All she need do is create a small force field bubble in your brain and instant embolism.

The concern is more from a psychological point of view, she hypothetically has a tangible way to remove herself from the normal constraints of morality and ethics.
It is interesting to note that it is the remaining member of the group is the only other who in my opinion has the freedom to become evil or selfish. The Thing, like the others is already outside of normal society but even within his unusual family group he is still the outsider. Not actually related but adopted by the family in almost an uncle role. He is unable to blend into the crowd, he is the absolute opposite of invisible.
It is Ben’s appearance that provides the most likely source of corruptibility. His appearance in conjunction with his near invulnerability. He looks like a monster. People who aren’t close to him or fans are repulsed or frightened by his orange rocky hide. If it’s the monster that society expects why not give in and provide it? Fortunately the Thing is made of stronger morals but that’s a whole different article!
S o what is it that keeps the Invisible Woman on the straight and narrow? Is it possibly because she does have that miniature society found within the Fantastic four?
A distinct possibility is the concept of care ethics that has contributed to Susan not crossing into moral corruption or abandonment. Care ethics is a concept considered in what some have termed feminist ethics. It is a theory that places more importance on relationships and that the highest moral ethics consider the emotions and feelings of others. This line of thinking being developed through female experiences that throughout history women have been the primary care providers in society and their families.
For example would it be morally right to tell a child that their drawing is inaccurate or bad despite their obvious pride in their technically poor artwork. Or is it ethically right to lie to that child in order to encourage them to continue experimenting and practising to become better?
One line of reasoning may state that it is wrong to lie absolutely no matter the situation. That truth is the only moral response and the emotions of the recipient should never come into it. Care ethics would examine the reaction that telling such an absolute truth would create and weighs up the decision to lie based on those factors.
So does the Invisible Woman rely on care ethics in considering her moral position? Is it her natural or at least broader society driven impulses of care that pushes her inclination towards good. Does the concern of the reaction or response from her miniature society or family factor in and without the Fantastic four would Susan drift into a more unethical existence?
There are of course other parts at play within the Invisible Woman’s moral code. Her upbringing and religious nature for instance. It is also interesting to note that in issue 54 of What If (a comic book series that poses hypothetical scenarios outside of the normal Marvel Comics continuum) that after a particularly powerful foe kills Mr Fantastic Susan becomes quickly enraged and vengeful when discussing the enemy to the eventual unleashing of her full powers at him after witnessing the deaths of the remaining members of the Fantastic Four at his hands.

Not that I don’t think as an individual Susan wouldn’t be a positive force but it is a good thing for the rest of the Marvel comics universe that The Invisible Woman does have the rest of the Fantastic Four because as a villain she would be quite the force to be reckoned with.
Lee is a a huge popular culture freak, loves comic books, science fiction, soundtracks and writes for Quit Your Day Job.